Fox v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fox v. State

844 S.W.2d 84, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1644, 1992 WL 314205

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fox v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1638 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 3, 1992·No. No. 61542·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant John Fox (Movant) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The denial is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant John Fox (Movant) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The denial is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

Fox v. State, 844 S.W.2d 84, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1644, 1992 WL 314205 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

844 S.W.2d 84 (Fox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.