Fox v. State

105 S.E. 314, 26 Ga. App. 21, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 243
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1920
Docket11455
StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 314 (Fox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fox v. State, 105 S.E. 314, 26 Ga. App. 21, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 243 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) To a certified question from this court the Supreme Court answered, in substance, that the question as to the jurisdiction of the trial court was not raised in that court by the usual general grounds of the motion for a new trial, and that it could not be considered when made for the first time in this court. See full opinion of the Supreme Court, 150 Ga. 673 (104 S. E. 361). It follows from what [23]*23has been said that this court cannot hold that the lower court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodxvorbh, JJ.j concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fox v. State
104 S.E. 631 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E. 314, 26 Ga. App. 21, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-state-gactapp-1920.