Fox v. State

225 So. 2d 198, 45 Ala. App. 92, 1969 Ala. App. LEXIS 329
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 17, 1969
Docket1 Div. 385
StatusPublished

This text of 225 So. 2d 198 (Fox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fox v. State, 225 So. 2d 198, 45 Ala. App. 92, 1969 Ala. App. LEXIS 329 (Ala. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

The appellant was found guilty upon a complaint charging that she did buy, sell, or possess prohibited liquors, etc.

The record shows there was no arraignment of appellant. Ordinarily, we would remand. Rorex v. State, 44 Ala.App., 112, 203 So.2d 294. But the warrant to search defendant’s private dwelling was issued by a person not shown to have authority nor in what capacity he acted, upon an affidavit which was based solely on affiant’s conclusion. From the evidence in the record it would be impossible for the state on a remandment to improve its already untenable position.

Reversed and rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rorex v. State
203 So. 2d 294 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 So. 2d 198, 45 Ala. App. 92, 1969 Ala. App. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-state-alactapp-1969.