Fox v. Smith
This text of 85 S.E. 856 (Fox v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “All mechanics of every sort, for work done and material furnished in manufacturing or repairing personal property, shall have a special lien on the same.” Civil Code, § 3354. The lien so provided for is afforded to mechanics, notwithstanding the work employed in manufacturing or repairing the property may have been performed entirety by an employee of the mechanic. Quillian v. Central Railroad &c. Co., 52 Ga. 374. See also Bruton & Wade v. Beasley, 135 Ga. 412 (69 S. E. 561).
(o) Accordingly, a flfm engaged in operating a repair-shop where others are employed to do expert-mechanical work, and where material is furnished for the repair of carriages and automobiles, is entitled to a lien-on the property manufactured or improved.
2. The above rulings dispose of the only question raised by the bill of exceptions. ■ Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.E. 856, 143 Ga. 547, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-smith-ga-1915.