Fox v. Schultz

720 A.2d 290, 351 Md. 666, 1998 Md. LEXIS 874
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 13, 1998·No. No. 114·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above case, it is this 13th day of November, 1998,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Special Appeals for reconsideration in light of Matthews v. Amberwood, 351 Md. 544, 719 A.2d 119 (1998). Costs in this Court to be paid by respondents. Costs in the Court of Special Appeals to abide the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fox v. Schultz, 720 A.2d 290, 351 Md. 666, 1998 Md. LEXIS 874 (Md. 1998).

720 A.2d 290 (Fox v. Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.
719 A.2d 119 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1998)