Fox v. Schultz

720 A.2d 290, 351 Md. 666, 1998 Md. LEXIS 874
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedNovember 13, 1998
DocketNo. 114
StatusPublished

This text of 720 A.2d 290 (Fox v. Schultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fox v. Schultz, 720 A.2d 290, 351 Md. 666, 1998 Md. LEXIS 874 (Md. 1998).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above case, it is this 13th day of November, 1998,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Special Appeals for reconsideration in light of Matthews v. Amberwood, 351 Md. 544, 719 A.2d 119 (1998). Costs in this Court to be paid by respondents. Costs in the Court of Special Appeals to abide the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.
719 A.2d 119 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
720 A.2d 290, 351 Md. 666, 1998 Md. LEXIS 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-schultz-md-1998.