Fox v. Schenck
304 N.E.2d 775, 33 N.Y.2d 750, 350 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 974
This text of 304 N.E.2d 775 (Fox v. Schenck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fox v. Schenck, 304 N.E.2d 775, 33 N.Y.2d 750, 350 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 974 (N.Y. 1973).
Opinion
Order reversed, without costs, and the petition dismissed. In our opinion the revocation of respondent’s licenses by the Superintendent of Insurance in the circumstances disclosed in this record did not constitute an abuse of discretion as a matter of law.
Concur: Chief Judge Ftjld and Judges Bubke, Bbeitel, Jasen, Gabbielli, Jones and Wachtleb.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
304 N.E.2d 775, 33 N.Y.2d 750, 350 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-schenck-ny-1973.