Fox v. Rehsteiner

18 Ohio C.C. 610
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedJanuary 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Ohio C.C. 610 (Fox v. Rehsteiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fox v. Rehsteiner, 18 Ohio C.C. 610 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

Opinion

Held — 1. That plaintiff; in error, as assignee of one Yaeger, a contractor, acquired by assignment and had only such rights as Yaeger, the assignor, had at the time of the assignment. That by the statute on mechanic’s liens Yaeger was precluded from disputing the amount or validity of Wunker & Rehsteiner’s lien and claim by his failure to proceed under the statute, sections 8199 and 3200,to contest it,, hence his assignee, Fox,is precluded here from contesting it.

2. Sod furnished to a publio park is material furnished for“ the construction, improvement or repair cf a * * * public improvement, ” within the meaning of section 3193, Revised Statutes.

Wherefore the court of ocmmon pleas did not err in its judgments on the several demurrers filed in that court, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Ohio C.C. 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-rehsteiner-ohiocirct-1899.