Fox v. Radel Leather Manufacturing Co.
189 A. 366, 121 N.J. Eq. 291
Opinion
For the reasons expressed in the foregoing opinion of Vice-Chancellor Stein, the decree appealed from will be affirmed, with the following modification, to wit: the defendants should be held liable to the complainant in the sum of $9,600 with simple interest only, to be computed from May 24th, 1933, to the date of payment rather than with interest thereon from said date to be computed by annual rests, as provided in said decree.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fox v. Radel Leather Manufacturing Co., 189 A. 366, 121 N.J. Eq. 291 (N.J. 1937).
189 A. 366 (Fox v. Radel Leather Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
NJ Transportation Dep't v. PSC Resources, Inc.
419 A.2d 1151 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1980)
McKee v. Harris-Seybold Co.
264 A.2d 98 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Messer v. Commissioner
52 T.C. 440 (U.S. Tax Court, 1969)
Jackson v. Diamond T. Trucking Co.
241 A.2d 471 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
Kleinberg v. Schwartz
208 A.2d 803 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
State v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
136 A.2d 636 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1957)
Newark v. Jos. Hollander, Inc.
42 A.2d 872 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)