Fox v. Peoples

50 A. 226, 201 Pa. 9, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 705
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 8, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 18·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

It seems to us that the learned judge of the court below did [11]*11not err in granting the nonsuit or in refusing to take it off. It plainly appears in his opinion that nothing was shown in the evidence which would have warranted a submission of the case to the jury. The appeal is therefore dismissed and the nonsuit affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fox v. Peoples, 50 A. 226, 201 Pa. 9, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 705 (Pa. 1901).

50 A. 226 (Fox v. Peoples) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slack v. Villari
476 A.2d 227 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1984)
Hamilton v. Smith
219 A.2d 783 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1966)
Bucia v. Bucia
160 A. 140 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)