Fox v. Peacock

153 A.D. 887, 138 N.Y.S. 535
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1912·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The plaintiffs alleged a cause of action against these defendants. They failed before the referee, and the defendants obtained a judgment on their counterclaim. The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment for the defendants upon that determination, and have clearly the right to review it. The action may be continued by and against the original parties, notwithstanding the assignment, under section 756 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The motion should, therefore, be denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fox v. Peacock, 153 A.D. 887, 138 N.Y.S. 535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

153 A.D. 887 (Fox v. Peacock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marco v. Sachs
201 Misc. 928 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)
White v. Hardy
180 Misc. 63 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
Fox v. Peacock
140 N.Y.S. 1119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)