Fox v. North Carolina

Supreme Court

Fox v. North Carolina

378 U.S. 587, 84 S. Ct. 1901, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1032, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 876

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 22, 1964

Docket5

StatusPublished

This text of 378 U.S. 587 (Fox v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fox v. North Carolina, 378 U.S. 587, 84 S. Ct. 1901, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1032, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 876 (1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for consideration in light of Robinson v. Florida, ante, p. 153.

Mr. Justice Douglas would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242. Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for consideration in light of Robinson v. Florida, ante, p. 153.

Mr. Justice Douglas would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242. Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

378 U.S. 587, 84 S. Ct. 1901, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1032, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-north-carolina-scotus-1964.