Fox v. Muller

City of New York Municipal Court

Fox v. Muller

31 Misc. 800, 62 N.Y.S. 1129

DecidedMarch 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Misc. 800 (Fox v. Muller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fox v. Muller, 31 Misc. 800, 62 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Ooylay, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to sever the action after an interlocutory judgment entered upon a demurrer to separate defenses and a trial and verdict as to the remaining issues.

[801]*801We think the plaintiff has mistaken the meaning of the sections of the Code on which he relies for a reversal of the order, and that the aid of sections 456 and 1205 may not he successfully invoked in his favor.

The order appealed from must, therefore, he affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of the court below at Special Term.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI