Fox v. LaManna

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2008·No. 08-6381·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6381

CLARENCE T. FOX, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN J. LAMANNA, in his individual capacity; R. MCLAFFERTY, in his individual capacity; BRIAN FINNERTY; BRIAN GILMORE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, in its official capacity; HARLEY G. LAPPIN, in his individual capacity,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cv-01785-GRA)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence T. Fox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Clarence T. Fox, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fox v.

LaManna, No. 2:06-cv-01785-GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fox v. LaManna, (4th Cir. 2008).

Fox v. LaManna (Fox v. LaManna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related