Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Fox v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Fox v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

182 S.E. 662, 209 N.C. 115, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 42
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 11, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 182 S.E. 662 (Fox v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fox v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 182 S.E. 662, 209 N.C. 115, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 42 (N.C. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since there is no evidence of how the beet got upon the floor of the aisle, or of how long the beet had been upon the floor before the plaintiff stepped on it, there is no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant. The defendant is not an insurer of the safety of those who enter its store for the purpose of making purchases, and the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable. Before the plaintiff can recover she must, by evidence, establish actionable negligence on .the part of the defendant, Bowden v. Kress, 198 N. C., 559; Cooke v. Tea Co., 204 N. C., 495, and this she has failed to do.

The judgment is ,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smithson v. WT Grant Company
153 S.E.2d 68 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
Morgan v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
145 S.E.2d 877 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Long v. National Food Stores, Inc.
136 S.E.2d 275 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
Edna L. Duggins v. Colonial Stores, Inc.
323 F.2d 117 (Fourth Circuit, 1963)
Raper v. McCRORY-McLELLAN CORPORATION
130 S.E.2d 281 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. v. Mary F. Bailey
271 F.2d 573 (Fourth Circuit, 1959)
Waters v. Harris
110 S.E.2d 283 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
Thomas F. Mullen, Jr. v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
252 F.2d 232 (Fourth Circuit, 1958)
Hunter v. Dixie Home Stores
101 S.E.2d 262 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1957)
Reese v. Piedmont, Inc.
82 S.E.2d 365 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Revis v. Orr
66 S.E.2d 652 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Fanelty v. Rogers Jewelers, Inc.
55 S.E.2d 493 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Harris v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
53 S.E.2d 536 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Watkins v. Taylor Furnishing Co.
31 S.E.2d 917 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
Pratt v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
12 S.E.2d 242 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Griggs v. . Sears, Roebuck Co.
10 S.E.2d 623 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Brown v. . Montgomery Ward Co.
8 S.E.2d 199 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Allison v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
99 F.2d 507 (Fourth Circuit, 1938)
Anderson v. Reidsville Amusement Co.
195 S.E. 386 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 S.E. 662, 209 N.C. 115, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nc-1935.