Fox v. Fox
995 A.2d 348, 606 Pa. 112, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1183
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court VACATED, and the matter REMANDED to that court for consideration of the issue in light of Berry v. Berry, 898 A.2d 1100, 1104 (Pa.Super.2006) (in determining income for support purposes, trial court may not include income constituting marital property under 23 Pa.C.S. § 3501, as such action would foreclose equitable distribution of those assets). Jurisdiction relinquished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fox v. Fox, 995 A.2d 348, 606 Pa. 112, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1183 (Pa. 2010).
995 A.2d 348 (Fox v. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Berry v. Berry
898 A.2d 1100 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)