Fox v. Fox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fox v. Fox

17 A.D.2d 939, 233 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 939 (Fox v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fox v. Fox, 17 A.D.2d 939, 233 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed on the law and on the facts, with costs to defendant-respondent. We find no justification for the charges and criticism leveled by appellant against the Trial Justice. The record does not demonstrate that the Trial Justice departed from acceptable standards of judicial conduct or from an attitude of disinterestedness so as to deprive plaintiff of a fair and impartial trial. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed on the law and on the facts, with costs to defendant-respondent. We find no justification for the charges and criticism leveled by appellant against the Trial Justice. The record does not demonstrate that the Trial Justice departed from acceptable standards of judicial conduct or from an attitude of disinterestedness so as to deprive plaintiff of a fair and impartial trial. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 939, 233 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-fox-nyappdiv-1962.