Fox v. Feltz
142 A.D.2d 996, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15037
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Although the court erred in finding that no extraordinary circumstances existed which would warrant consideration of the best interests of the children (see, Matter of Michael Paul T. v Thomas R., 124 AD2d 970), it nevertheless properly found that the best interests of the children would be served by awarding custody to the father. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, J.—custody.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fox v. Feltz, 142 A.D.2d 996, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
142 A.D.2d 996 (Fox v. Feltz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Michael Paul T. v. Thomas R.
124 A.D.2d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)