Fox v. Feltz
This text of 142 A.D.2d 996 (Fox v. Feltz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Although the court erred in finding that no extraordinary circumstances existed which would warrant consideration of the best interests of the children (see, Matter of Michael Paul T. v Thomas R., 124 AD2d 970), it nevertheless properly found that the best interests of the children would be served by awarding custody to the father. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, J.—custody.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 A.D.2d 996, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-feltz-nyappdiv-1988.