Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6409

CLARENCE T. FOX, JR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, in its official capacity; PAUL GONZALES, in his individual capacity; KATHERYN MACK, in her individual capacity; BRENDA SHELL, in her individual capacity,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:08-cv-02431-GRA)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 4, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence T. Fox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence T. Fox, Jr., appeals the district court’s

orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge,

denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fox v.

Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 0:08-cv-02431-GRA (D.S.C. Jan. 27 &

Mar. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED