Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Fourth Circuit

Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

112 F. App'x 271

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2004·No. No. 04-6907·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Geraldine and Clarence Fox appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil rights suit and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-04-152-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31 & May 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Geraldine and Clarence Fox appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil rights suit and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-04-152-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31 & May 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 112 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

112 F. App'x 271 (Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.