Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Fourth Circuit

Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

112 F. App'x 271

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 20, 2004

DocketNo. 04-6907

StatusPublished

This text of 112 F. App'x 271 (Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 112 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Geraldine and Clarence Fox appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil rights suit and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-04-152-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31 & May 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Geraldine and Clarence Fox appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil rights suit and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-04-152-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31 & May 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 F. App'x 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-federal-bureau-of-prisons-ca4-2004.