Fox v. Ealer
This text of 2 Miles 169 (Fox v. Ealer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This rule must be discharged. The first, second, and third sections of the act of 10th June, 1838, contemplate that the parties shall agree that the submission shall be made a rule of court. Here there is no such agreement. Our act is evidently framed on the basis of the provisions of the statute of the 9th and 10th William III. cap. 15, which have been repeatedly construed to require an agreement that the submission shall be made a rule of court, before it will be made so. Wats, on Jlrb. 25.
Rule discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Miles 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-ealer-pactcomplphilad-1837.