Fox v. De Graaf

36 N.Y.S. 1125, 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 641, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 902
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 2, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 36 N.Y.S. 1125 (Fox v. De Graaf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fox v. De Graaf, 36 N.Y.S. 1125, 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 641, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 902 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. The action was brought to recover for the board of Robert De Graaf under the contract with the defendant’s testator. The agreement was established, and the report is sustained by proof, and no question of law is involved. Judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 N.Y.S. 1125, 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 641, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-de-graaf-nysupct-1895.