Fox v. Coon

64 Miss. 465
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 64 Miss. 465 (Fox v. Coon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fox v. Coon, 64 Miss. 465 (Mich. 1886).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Robert N. Fox was disabled from acquiring from the State and holding the fee against his co-tenants of the estate after the termination of the life estate of the dowress, i. e., he held the fee as trustee for all the co-tenants, but he was under no disability as to the life estate, and could hold that for himself. So that as to it he was [468]*468sole owner, and as to the fee after the termination of the life estate, he was holder for himself and co-tenants. Harrison v. Harrison, 56 Miss. 174; Lenoir v. Bridges, MS. No. 3440.

The deed of trust conveyed all his interest. The life estate has not terminated, and is held by the defendant, which fact is a bar to the suit for partition or sale for division of the proceeds, but the bill has a double aspect, and the complainants are entitled to have the deeds of which they complain as clouds on their title limited by decree of the court according to the rights of the parties, so as to avoid embarrassment at a future day.

Whether the beneficiary in the deed of trust executed by R. N. Fox was a bona fide purchaser entitled to hold the land as such does not arise on the demurrer to the bill, and should be presented by plea or answer. On this view of the case the demurrer should have been overruled.

Decree reversed, demurrer overruled, and cause remanded with leave to the defendant to plead or answer within thirty days after the mandate herein shall have been filed in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Enterprise Plumbing Co. v. Bailey Mortgage Co.
209 So. 2d 825 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1968)
Brown v. Brothers
97 So. 2d 642 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1957)
Tillman v. Richton Tie & Timber Co.
80 So. 2d 745 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1955)
McGee v. Carter
212 S.W.2d 902 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1948)
Lincoln v. Mills
2 So. 2d 809 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1941)
Walker v. Woods
144 So. 703 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1932)
Green v. Halsted
238 P. 40 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1925)
Whitfield v. Miles
58 So. 8 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1911)
Jordan v. Bobbitt
45 So. 311 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1907)
Shipp v. McKee
80 Miss. 741 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1902)
Gilleylen v. Martin
73 Miss. 695 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1896)
Robinson v. Lewis
68 Miss. 69 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Miss. 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-coon-miss-1886.