Fox v. Commissioner

1998 T.C. Memo. 48, 75 T.C.M. 1727, 1998 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 50
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fox v. Commissioner. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 T.C.M. 2195
United States Tax Court·Decided February 9, 1998·No. Tax Ct. Dkt. No. 16226-96·Unpublished

Opinion

JUDITH WEINGARTH FOX, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Fox v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. Dkt. No. 16226-96
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1998-48; 1998 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 50; 75 T.C.M. (CCH) 1727;
February 9, 1998, Filed

*50 Decision will be entered pursuant to Rule 155.

Michael D. Baker, for respondent.
Judith Weingarth Fox, pro se.
FOLEY, JUDGE.

FOLEY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FOLEY, JUDGE: Respondent determined the following deficiencies in and additions to petitioner's Federal income taxes:

Additions to Tax
YearDeficiencySec. 6651(a)Sec. 6654
1987$ 14,493$ 3,623$ 783
198850,02912,5073,198
19891,163291--
199034,7678,6922,290

After concessions by the parties, the only remaining issues are whether petitioner is liable for the additions to tax set forth below:

Additions to Tax
YearSec. 6651(a)Sec. 6654
1987$ 1,150$ 280
1988611157
19901,186--

*51 At the time the petition was filed, petitioner resided in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure

Section 6651(a) imposes an addition to tax for failure to file a tax return in a timely manner. Petitioner's tax returns for 1987, 1988, and 1990 were due on April 15, 1988, 1989, and 1991, respectively. Petitioner, however, did not file such returns until October 10, 1997. Petitioner has failed to establish that her tardiness was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. Sec. 6651(a); ; . Accordingly, petitioner is liable for the section 6651(a) additions to tax.

Section 6654 imposes an addition to tax for failure to make estimated tax payments. Petitioner did not remit estimated tax payments for the years in issue. In addition, she has failed to establish that she falls within any of the exceptions to section 6654. Therefore, petitioner is liable for the section 6654 additions to*52 tax.

All other arguments raised by the parties are either moot or without merit.

To reflect the foregoing,

Decision will be entered pursuant to Rule 155.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fox v. Commissioner, 1998 T.C. Memo. 48, 75 T.C.M. 1727, 1998 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 50 (tax 1998).

1998 T.C. Memo. 48 (Fox v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.