Fox v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Fox v. City of New York

50 Misc. 2d 928, 271 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1853

DecidedMay 23, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 50 Misc. 2d 928 (Fox v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fox v. City of New York, 50 Misc. 2d 928, 271 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1853 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Joseph A. Sarafite, J.

By this article 78 CPLR proceeding, petitioner seeks discovery and inspection from respondent Police Department of the City of Mew York of photographs, taken by a police officer, of the scene of an accident in which petitioner was involved and was injured. Petitioner’s contention is that the photographs constitute public reports and records within the purview of section 66-a of the Public Officers Law so that they may be inspected by any person having an interest in same, such as petitioner. The trouble with this argument, however, is that the photographs are not such reports and records of an accident that are required by statute to be “ kept or maintained * * * by the police department ’ ’, and are not, therefore, open to public inspection pursuant to section 66-a of the Public Officers Law (see Brecht v. City of New York, 14 A D 2d 790). Moreover, on the face of the public police department accident report, which petitioner ivas permitted to inspect, there appears no statutory or other requirement that photographs of the scene of an accident be taken or be annexed as a part of the said record and form. The only mandate which appears is that information as to “ police action’-’ taken be listed, which includes the name and identification of any police officer who may have taken photographs at the scene. Petitioner may, hereafter, as he may be advised and upon a proper showing within the context of the action at law itself, seek to obtain discovery and inspection of the said photographs, but he cannot do so by way of this special proceeding. Accordingly, the application is denied, and the petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph A. Sarafite, J.

By this article 78 CPLR proceeding, petitioner seeks discovery and inspection from respondent Police Department of the City of Mew York of photographs, taken by a police officer, of the scene of an accident in which petitioner was involved and was injured. Petitioner’s contention is that the photographs constitute public reports and records within the purview of section 66-a of the Public Officers Law so that they may be inspected by any person having an interest in same, such as petitioner. The trouble with this argument, however, is that the photographs are not such reports and records of an accident that are required by statute to be “ kept or maintained * * * by the police department ’ ’, and are not, therefore, open to public inspection pursuant to section 66-a of the Public Officers Law (see Brecht v. City of New York, 14 A D 2d 790). Moreover, on the face of the public police department accident report, which petitioner ivas permitted to inspect, there appears no statutory or other requirement that photographs of the scene of an accident be taken or be annexed as a part of the said record and form. The only mandate which appears is that information as to “ police action’-’ taken be listed, which includes the name and identification of any police officer who may have taken photographs at the scene. Petitioner may, hereafter, as he may be advised and upon a proper showing within the context of the action at law itself, seek to obtain discovery and inspection of the said photographs, but he cannot do so by way of this special proceeding. Accordingly, the application is denied, and the petition is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Misc. 2d 928, 271 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-city-of-new-york-nysupct-1966.