Fox v. Bynum

1967 OK CR 159, 432 P.2d 137
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 20, 1967
DocketNo. A-14326
StatusPublished

This text of 1967 OK CR 159 (Fox v. Bynum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fox v. Bynum, 1967 OK CR 159, 432 P.2d 137 (Okla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge.

Homer Carroll Fox, Petitioner in the above styled and numbered cause, is an inmate in the Federal Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, where he is currently confined by virtue of a judgment and sentence rendered against him for the crime of bank robbery, committed while on parole from the Oklahoma State Penitentiary at Mc-Alester. Petitioner was arrested in Tucson, Arizona by the federal authorities, and was thereafter tried and convicted for said charge. .⅞

He seeks an order of this Court directing the Pardon and Parole Board of Oklahoma to dismiss a detainer warrant placed against him for the violation of his parole of the 40 year sentences on which he was paroled.

We are of the opinion that the petition does not allege facts sufficient to grant the relief prayed for and we, accordingly, deny the same. Writ denied.

BRETT, J., and NIX, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1967 OK CR 159, 432 P.2d 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-bynum-oklacrimapp-1967.