Fox Insurance Company Incorpor v. Centers for Medicare and Medic
This text of 439 F. App'x 651 (Fox Insurance Company Incorpor v. Centers for Medicare and Medic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Fox Insurance Company Incorporated appeals the district court’s denial of its *652 request for a preliminary injunction requiring the Secretary of Health and Human Services to enter into a new Medicare Part D prescription drug provider contract with Fox, and to assign Fox new prescription drug beneficiaries.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, Inc., 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying the preliminary injunction.
Appellant’s motion to expedite oral argument is denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 F. App'x 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-insurance-company-incorpor-v-centers-for-medicare-and-medic-ca9-2011.