Fox (Dustin) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
This text of Fox (Dustin) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Fox (Dustin) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DUSTIN PETE FOX, No. 80046 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE FILED MARY KAY HOLTHUS, DISTRICT NOV 2 7 2019 JUDGE, ELIZABETH A. BROWN Respondents, OLERKDF SUPREME COURT
and BY ç. \t DEPU51; GLERK THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS OR MANDAMUS
This emergency, original petition for a writ of habeas corpus or mandarnus challenges a November 21, 2019, district court order denying petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus or motion to vacate detention order. The State has timely filed an answer, as directed. Having reviewed the parties arguments and supporting documentation, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. See Jones v. Neu. Comin'n on Jud. Discipline, 130 Nev. 99, 104, 318 P.3d 1078, 1082 (2014) ("Whether to consider a petition for extraordinary relief. . . is within our sole discretion."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Hardesty
J. Stiglich Silver
H-9 gs)0 cc: Hon. Mary Kay Holthus, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
tO) 1947A AI* 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fox (Dustin) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-dustin-vs-dist-ct-state-nev-2019.