Fox (Derek) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DEREK RYAN FOX, No. 81202 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, JUN 0 4 2020 Respondent, EL2ABETH A. BROWN CLERK91 9UPRE1VE COURT

and BY ' THE STATE OF NEVADA, DEPUTY CLERK

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

In this original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition, petitioner seeks a writ directing the district court to dismiss the criminal complaint against him on the basis that the district court violated his right to a speedy trial.

We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter and, without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) C'Petitioned cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.").

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

0) 1947A 44PD O -014:TO

Further, to the extent that petitioner has counsel, he must proceed by and through his counsel of record. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Peek.tu ,C.J.

Pickering

, J. , J.

Hardesty Stiglich

cc: Derek Ryan Fox

Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A ariam