Fowlkes v. Hanlon

Fourth Circuit

Fowlkes v. Hanlon

585 F. App'x 18

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2014·No. No. 14-1533·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sean Darnell Fowlkes appeals the district court’s order finding that the defendant was entitled to absolute immunity and denying relief on Fowlkes’ complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fowlkes v. Hanlon, No. 1:14-cv-01270-CCB (D.Md. May 12, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sean Darnell Fowlkes appeals the district court’s order finding that the defendant was entitled to absolute immunity and denying relief on Fowlkes’ complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fowlkes v. Hanlon, No. 1:14-cv-01270-CCB (D.Md. May 12, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Fowlkes v. Hanlon, 585 F. App'x 18 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

585 F. App'x 18 (Fowlkes v. Hanlon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.