Fowlkes v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit

Fowlkes v. Angelone

67 F. App'x 208

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fowlkes v. Angelone. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 F. App'x 211 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2003·No. 02-7041·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Donnell Fowlkes appeals the district court’s denial of his successive habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) prior to obtaining authorization to file it in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000). Due to our recent denial of Fowlkes’ petition to file a successive habeas petition, see In re: Fowlkes, 326 F.3d 542 (4th Cir.2003), his appeal in this ease is moot. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and grant the Appellee’s unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Larry Donnell Fowlkes appeals the district court’s denial of his successive habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) prior to obtaining authorization to file it in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000). Due to our recent denial of Fowlkes’ petition to file a successive habeas petition, see In re: Fowlkes, 326 F.3d 542 (4th Cir.2003), his appeal in this ease is moot. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and grant the Appellee’s unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Fowlkes v. Angelone, 67 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

67 F. App'x 208 (Fowlkes v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related