Fowlkes v. Angelone
This text of 67 F. App'x 208 (Fowlkes v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Larry Donnell Fowlkes appeals the district court’s denial of his successive habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) prior to obtaining authorization to file it in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000). Due to our recent denial of Fowlkes’ petition to file a successive habeas petition, see In re: Fowlkes, 326 F.3d 542 (4th Cir.2003), his appeal in this ease is moot. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and grant the Appellee’s unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 F. App'x 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowlkes-v-angelone-ca4-2003.