Fowler v. Webb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fowler v. Webb

161 A.D. 888, 145 N.Y.S. 1123

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 161 A.D. 888 (Fowler v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fowler v. Webb, 161 A.D. 888, 145 N.Y.S. 1123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified so as to require the defendants to specify: First, the representations alleged to have been made by the plaintiffs to the defendants, which are claimed to be false as set forth in the 4th paragraph of defendants’ answer, setting forth to whom made, by whom, the place and approximately the time, and whether any of the statements were in writing. Second, the amount paid for experts. Third, approximately the location of the tunnel driven. Fourth, approximately the number of borings that were made and, as near as may be, when and where. Fifth, what machinery, engine or boilers were repaired, and the cost thereof. Sixth, all sums of money paid out by defendants, together with the nature of such payments by reason of the false representations alleged in the answer. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified so as to require the defendants to specify: First, the representations alleged to have been made by the plaintiffs to the defendants, which are claimed to be false as set forth in the 4th paragraph of defendants’ answer, setting forth to whom made, by whom, the place and approximately the time, and whether any of the statements were in writing. Second, the amount paid for experts. Third, approximately the location of the tunnel driven. Fourth, approximately the number of borings that were made and, as near as may be, when and where. Fifth, what machinery, engine or boilers were repaired, and the cost thereof. Sixth, all sums of money paid out by defendants, together with the nature of such payments by reason of the false representations alleged in the answer. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 A.D. 888, 145 N.Y.S. 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-webb-nyappdiv-1914.