Fowler v. Vreeland
44 N.J. Eq. 268
Opinion
The parties to the deeds in question clearly intended that the lands covered by the waters of Vreeland lake should be expressly excepted from the conveyances made by Vreeland, and that they should not be transferred by those conveyances.
The reformation should be made for the reasons stated by the Vice-Chancellor.
The decree will be affirmed.
Decree unanimously affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fowler v. Vreeland, 44 N.J. Eq. 268 (N.J. 1888).
44 N.J. Eq. 268 (Fowler v. Vreeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barcus v. Blanchard
39 A.2d 499 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)