Fowler v. Vreeland
44 N.J. Eq. 268
This text of 44 N.J. Eq. 268 (Fowler v. Vreeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fowler v. Vreeland, 44 N.J. Eq. 268 (N.J. 1888).
Opinion
The parties to the deeds in question clearly intended that the lands covered by the waters of Vreeland lake should be expressly excepted from the conveyances made by Vreeland, and that they should not be transferred by those conveyances.
The reformation should be made for the reasons stated by the Vice-Chancellor.
The decree will be affirmed.
Decree unanimously affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Barcus v. Blanchard
39 A.2d 499 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 N.J. Eq. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-vreeland-nj-1888.