Fowler v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company

212 S.E.2d 486, 133 Ga. App. 842, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2309
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 4, 1975
Docket50045
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 212 S.E.2d 486 (Fowler v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fowler v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 212 S.E.2d 486, 133 Ga. App. 842, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2309 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Pannell, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff, an officer of a corporation, was furnished the use of an automobile by the corporation with whom she was employed. This automobile was insured by the appellee-defendant in a policy in which a corporation of a slightly different name was the named insured, and which policy contained uninsured motorist coverage under Code § 56-407A (Code Ann. § 56-407.1). Plaintiff was injured by an uninsured motorist while plaintiff was neither operating or riding in or upon, nor entering or *843 alighting from the insured automobile; she was merely going out to pick up the newspaper in her front yard when struck by the uninsured motorist. Plaintiff secured a judgment against the uninsured motorist and in the present action seeks to recover against the defendant-insurer, and has entered an appeal to this court from the grant of a summary judgment in favor of the insurer. Held:

Argued January 9, 1975 Decided February 4, 1975. Hutto & Palmatary, Edward E. Boshears, for appellant. Nightingale, Liles & Dennard, B. N. Nightingale, for appellee.

Assuming, but not deciding, that the corporation for which the plaintiff was an officer and the named corporation in the policy were one and the same, the plaintiff was neither an insured under the policy nor was she required to be so under our Uninsured Motorist Statute. This case is controlled adversely to appellant by the decisions of this court in Gulf American Fire &c. Co. v. McNeal, 115 Ga. App. 286 (154 SE2d 411), followed in Bass v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 128 Ga. App. 285 (196 SE2d 485).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian and Clark, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bernard v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
426 S.E.2d 29 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
379 S.E.2d 183 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Buckner v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
486 N.E.2d 810 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Hogan v. Mayor &C. of Savannah
320 S.E.2d 555 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Anderson v. Ford
309 S.E.2d 854 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Purcell v. Allstate Insurance
310 S.E.2d 530 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 S.E.2d 486, 133 Ga. App. 842, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-united-states-fidelity-guaranty-company-gactapp-1975.