Fowler v. United States ex rel. Merrell-Soule Co.

277 F. 864, 51 App. D.C. 229, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2806
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 3, 1922
DocketNo. 3644
StatusPublished

This text of 277 F. 864 (Fowler v. United States ex rel. Merrell-Soule Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fowler v. United States ex rel. Merrell-Soule Co., 277 F. 864, 51 App. D.C. 229, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2806 (D.C. Cir. 1922).

Opinion

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

On February 12, 1921, appellee filed its petition for the writ of mandamus in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia to compel appellant, as health officer of the District of Columbia, to 'issue a permit to appellee which would authorize it to ship cream into the District.

A peremptory writ was issued on February 12th, on the petition and exhibits filed therewith. Thereafter the appellant filed a motion to quash the writ, which was overruled on the 18th day of March. Appeal was not taken until the 23d day of March. A motion to dismiss or affirm has been filed, and the case is ruled by our opinion in Rudolph et al. v. Sullivan, No. 3638, 277 Fed. 863, this day decided.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rudolph v. Sullivan
277 F. 863 (D.C. Circuit, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 F. 864, 51 App. D.C. 229, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-united-states-ex-rel-merrell-soule-co-cadc-1922.