Fowler v. Trataros Construction, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fowler v. Trataros Construction, Inc.

6 A.D.3d 385, 773 N.Y.S.2d 896, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3877

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.3d 385 (Fowler v. Trataros Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fowler v. Trataros Construction, Inc., 6 A.D.3d 385, 773 N.Y.S.2d 896, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-[386]*386party and second third-party defendant, New York Acoustics, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated October 3, 2002, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third party and second third-party complaints, and the defendants RWKS Transit, Inc., Impulse Enterprises of New York, Inc., and F&V/V&R/M&W Joint Venture, cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Prudenti, P.J., Smith, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-[386]*386party and second third-party defendant, New York Acoustics, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated October 3, 2002, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third party and second third-party complaints, and the defendants RWKS Transit, Inc., Impulse Enterprises of New York, Inc., and F&V/V&R/M&W Joint Venture, cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Prudenti, P.J., Smith, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.3d 385, 773 N.Y.S.2d 896, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-trataros-construction-inc-nyappdiv-2004.