Fowler v. Titzel

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Fowler v. Titzel

110 N.Y.S. 1128

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 110 N.Y.S. 1128 (Fowler v. Titzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fowler v. Titzel, 110 N.Y.S. 1128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only point advanced by the appellant is that the evidence offered on behalf of the defendant did not raise a question of fact. On the contrary, the record shows, not only that there was a question of fact raised very sharply, but also that on such issue the defendant’s testimony was corroborated by other witnesses, especially the witness Wright. We can find no reason for differing with tbe conclusion reached by the trial justice. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only point advanced by the appellant is that the evidence offered on behalf of the defendant did not raise a question of fact. On the contrary, the record shows, not only that there was a question of fact raised very sharply, but also that on such issue the defendant’s testimony was corroborated by other witnesses, especially the witness Wright. We can find no reason for differing with tbe conclusion reached by the trial justice. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 N.Y.S. 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-titzel-nyappterm-1908.