Fowler v. State

34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 181, 1981 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 32
CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois
DecidedMay 26, 1981
DocketNo. 78-CC-1907
StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 181 (Fowler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fowler v. State, 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 181, 1981 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 32 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1981).

Opinion

Holderman, J.

This matter coming on to be heard upon the motion of Respondent to dismiss the claim herein, due notice being given, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds that:

1. Claimant has brought this action, based upon a lapsed appropriation for products or services supplied during fiscal year 1978.

2. Rule 14 of the Rules of the Court of Claims of the State of Illinois states that departmental reports, submitted by State departments, are prima facie evidence of the facts set forth therein.

3. The report of the Department of Administrative Services states that at the close of fiscal year 1978 there were no funds remaining in the appropriation to pay the subject invoice, nor were there funds available for transfer.

4. Section 30 of an Act in relation to State Finance (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 127, par. 166), prohibits obligating the State to any indebtedness in excess of the money appropriated for a department.

Likewise, the Court of Claims has no authority to grant an award in cases where the balance of the appropriation remaining is insufficient.

It is hereby ordered that the motion of respondent be, and the same is, granted and this claim is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 181, 1981 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-state-ilclaimsct-1981.