Fowler v. State

61 So. 3d 483, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7251, 2011 WL 1899538
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 20, 2011
Docket5D10-4490
StatusPublished

This text of 61 So. 3d 483 (Fowler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fowler v. State, 61 So. 3d 483, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7251, 2011 WL 1899538 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On September 8, 2010, the trial court rendered an order denying Fowler’s motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Subsequently, on September 15, 2010, Fowler moved for leave to amend his motion, as provided in Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007). Although leave to *484 amend was granted, Fowler filed a notice of appeal from the September 8 order on October 6, 2010. 1 He then filed his amended rule 3.850 motion seven days later. Fowler subsequently moved for an extension of time to file a second amended rule 3.850 motion. The circuit court’s November 29, 2010, order partially granted the motion and also denied the additional ground raised in the first amended motion. 2 Fowler filed a notice of appeal from that order on December 16, 2010. This appeal deals only with those rulings.

A notice of appeal filed from an order denying a motion for postconviction relief deprives the circuit court of jurisdiction to consider an amended motion or any other motion pertaining to that postconviction proceeding. See Tellas v. State, 811 So.2d 756, 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Likewise, after filing a notice of appeal from a final order in a postconviction proceeding, a defendant abandons any pending motions in the circuit court relating to that case. See Lopez-Merced v. State, 949 So.2d 362, 363 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Moore v. State, 789 So.2d 551, 552 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Because Fowler appealed the order denying relief rendered on September 8, 2010, the order entered on November 29, 2010, was a nullity. It is, therefore, vacated and the appeal therefrom is dismissed. See Meintzer v. State, 943 So.2d 966, 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

ORDER VACATED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

TORPY, LAWSON, and COHEN JJ„ concur.
1

. That appeal is currently pending.

2

. While Fowler labels the first amendment an addendum/supplement to the original rule 3.850 motion, it is effectively an amended motion which raised an additional ground.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meintzer v. State
943 So. 2d 966 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Moore v. State
789 So. 2d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Lopez-Merced v. State
949 So. 2d 362 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
Tellas v. State
811 So. 2d 756 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 So. 3d 483, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7251, 2011 WL 1899538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.