Fowler v. Starr
3 Denio 164
This text of 3 Denio 164 (Fowler v. Starr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fowler v. Starr, 3 Denio 164 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).
Opinion
The plaintiffs may discontinue without paying costs to the defendant. They necessarily prosecuted as administrators in the right of their intestate, and there is no reason to believe that the action was brought wantonly, or that it was either commenced or conducted in bad faith. (2 R. S. 615, § 16,17.)
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Arnoux v. Steinbrenner
1 Paige Ch. 82 (New York Court of Chancery, 1828)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Denio 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-starr-nysupct-1846.