Fowler v. Starr

3 Denio 164
New York Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1846·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Beardsley, J.

The plaintiffs may discontinue without paying costs to the defendant. They necessarily prosecuted as administrators in the right of their intestate, and there is no reason to believe that the action was brought wantonly, or that it was either commenced or conducted in bad faith. (2 R. S. 615, § 16,17.)

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fowler v. Starr, 3 Denio 164 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

3 Denio 164 (Fowler v. Starr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arnoux v. Steinbrenner
1 Paige Ch. 82 (New York Court of Chancery, 1828)