Fowler v. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne, & Chicago Railroad
This text of 35 Pa. 22 (Fowler v. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne, & Chicago Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The purpose of an attachment execution is to reach the effects of a defendant in the hands of third persons. Here, the defendant is a corporation; a railroad company. Are its ticket agents to be treated as third persons, so far as regards [23]*23money received by them on the salé of tickets to passengers ? We think not. We suppose that the ease speaks of the ordinary ticket agents employed at the offices of the company; and of these we speak. These are the very hands of the company; it cannot do its business without them; and if an attachment execution is to be regarded.ás arresting money received after its service, then it would always occasion the dismissal of such agents, in order to prevent such a result.
We do not undertake to define the class of agents that fall within the principle here decided. We shall be able to do this better, by awaiting the instructions of experience.-
Judgment affirmed and record remitted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Pa. 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-pittsburgh-fort-wayne-chicago-railroad-pa-1859.