Fowler v. Madison

55 N.H. 171, 1875 N.H. LEXIS 56
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedMarch 11, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 N.H. 171 (Fowler v. Madison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fowler v. Madison, 55 N.H. 171, 1875 N.H. LEXIS 56 (N.H. 1875).

Opinions

In Bell v. Woodward, 47 N.H. 539, it was held that "A's declaration, soon after the purchase of a farm," that he bought it for B, "is not evidence to show that A did not afterwards live upon the farm and carry it on." The learned judge who delivered the opinion of the court said, — "The testimony of J. B. F. Woodward was irrelevant. The purpose for which Joshua Woodward bought the farm has no legal tendency to show what he did or did not do with the farm after the purchase."

This case is authority, if any authority were needed other than the principles of common sense, to show that the testimony was rightly excluded.

LADD, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ordway v. Sanders
58 N.H. 132 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 N.H. 171, 1875 N.H. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-madison-nh-1875.