Fowler v. Knowles

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Fowler v. Knowles

94 S.E. 898, 21 Ga. App. 727, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 495

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 31, 1918

Docket8585

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 898 (Fowler v. Knowles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fowler v. Knowles, 94 S.E. 898, 21 Ga. App. 727, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 495 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. It appears from the record that the clerk of the trial court failed to transmit to this court the bill of exceptions and a transcript of the record within the time required by law, and it also appears that this was due to the fault of the attorney for the plaintiff in error, who had and kept a part of the record in his possession, and that the clerk of the trial court was unable to get it from him. It follows that the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6185, 6186; Moore v. State, 13 Ga. App. 32 (78 S. E. 774), and cases there cited.

2. This bill of exceptions would have to be dismissed for the further reason that there is no proper assignment of error on the final judgment in the case.

Writ of error dismissed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1. It appears from the record that the clerk of the trial court failed to transmit to this court the bill of exceptions and a transcript of the record within the time required by law, and it also appears that this was due to the fault of the attorney for the plaintiff in error, who had and kept a part of the record in his possession, and that the clerk of the trial court was unable to get it from him. It follows that the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6185, 6186; Moore v. State, 13 Ga. App. 32 (78 S. E. 774), and cases there cited.

2. This bill of exceptions would have to be dismissed for the further reason that there is no proper assignment of error on the final judgment in the case.

Writ of error dismissed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 S.E. 898, 21 Ga. App. 727, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-knowles-gactapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack