Fowler v. Hait

New York Supreme Court

Fowler v. Hait

10 Johns. 111

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1813

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 10 Johns. 111 (Fowler v. Hait) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fowler v. Hait, 10 Johns. 111 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant having omitted to plead, or give notice of the former trial and judgment, was precluded from giving evidence of it, at the trial. It would produce surprise on the part of the plaintiff and injustice, if the defendant were allowed to set up, at the trial, special matter in bar, of which no notice had been previously given to the plaintiff The judgment musíbe affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant having omitted to plead, or give notice of the former trial and judgment, was precluded from giving evidence of it, at the trial. It would produce surprise on the part of the plaintiff and injustice, if the defendant were allowed to set up, at the trial, special matter in bar, of which no notice had been previously given to the plaintiff The judgment musíbe affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Johns. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-hait-nysupct-1813.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack