Fowler v. Gibson

4 Ark. 427
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJuly 15, 1842
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Ark. 427 (Fowler v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fowler v. Gibson, 4 Ark. 427 (Ark. 1842).

Opinion

By the Court,

Ringq, C. J.

The record before us shows, we think conclusively, that the execution, upon and by virtue of which the property mentioned in the condition of the delivery bond was seized by the sheriff, was issued upon the judgment which this Court has reversed,’ in the case of Holden Moss et al. vs. Lorenzo Gibson et al. And inasmuch as the judgment upon the delivery bond is dependent upon the judgment on which the execution issued, and on and by virtue of which the property mentioned in said bond was seized by the sheriff, and "the latter has been reversed; therefore, the judgment on the delivery bond must also be reversed, annulled, and set aside, with costs, in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Barton vs. Pettit & Bayard, reported in 7 Cranch, 288, and also, 2 Peters Cond. Rep. 494.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brokl v. Brokl
158 N.W. 436 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Ark. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-gibson-ark-1842.