Fovella v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Fovella v. State

210 S.W. 207, 85 Tex. Crim. 97, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 132

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 19, 1919

DocketNo. 5344.

StatusPublished

This text of 210 S.W. 207 (Fovella v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fovella v. State, 210 S.W. 207, 85 Tex. Crim. 97, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 132 (Tex. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In this case the appellant was tried for the offense of receiving and concealing stolen property valued at more than fifty dollars and was convicted and her punishment fixed at confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of two years.

*98 The ease is before this court without a bill of exceptions or a statement of facts; . the motion for new trial complains of certain errors, the decision of which would be governed by the facts if properly before us; but in the absence of a statement of facts we cannot tell whether the matters . complained of were error or not. The indictment sufficiently charges the offence and there appearing no fundamental errors the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In this case the appellant was tried for the offense of receiving and concealing stolen property valued at more than fifty dollars and was convicted and her punishment fixed at confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of two years.

*98 The ease is before this court without a bill of exceptions or a statement of facts; . the motion for new trial complains of certain errors, the decision of which would be governed by the facts if properly before us; but in the absence of a statement of facts we cannot tell whether the matters . complained of were error or not. The indictment sufficiently charges the offence and there appearing no fundamental errors the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 S.W. 207, 85 Tex. Crim. 97, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fovella-v-state-texcrimapp-1919.