Foutz (Brent) Vs. City Of Boulder City

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 2020·No. 80867·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BRENT FOUTZ, No. 80867 Appellant, vs. CITY OF BOULDER CITY, Respondent. FILED APR 0 9 2020

BY DEPWY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an• order of the district court denying an appeal from a municipal court conviction and remanding. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Richard•Scotti, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant's case arose in the municipal court. The district court has final appellate jurisdiction over a case arising in the municipal court. Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6; Tripp v. City of Sparks, 92 Nev. 362, 363, 550 P.2d 419, 419 (1976) ("Municipal court conviction is not subject to further review by appeal to this court."). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

ArAJbC4...0 Lid:I/AO-AD J. Stiglich Silver

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA - 33:513 (0) I947A ADD ' pip cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge Brent Foutz Attorney General/Carson City Boulder City Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Suennir Collar OF NEVADA

(0) ISM 4PD 2 1.11•411, Intil

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foutz (Brent) Vs. City Of Boulder City, (Neb. 2020).

Foutz (Brent) Vs. City Of Boulder City (Foutz (Brent) Vs. City Of Boulder City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tripp v. City of Sparks
550 P.2d 419 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1976)