Foust v. State

410 So. 2d 993, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19494
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 1982
DocketNo. 80-2081
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 410 So. 2d 993 (Foust v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foust v. State, 410 So. 2d 993, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19494 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Foust has perfected his appeal from an order entered by the circuit court, by which his probation was revoked and thereupon he was sentenced to serve a period of years of imprisonment.

Upon a careful reading of the record, we conclude that the evidence offered by the State to support its charge that Foust violated the terms and conditions of his probation is legally insufficient to support the order of revocation entered by the trial court. It therefore follows that the order revoking probation is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to the trial court to vacate the judgment and sentence imposed upon Eugene Foust, and reinstate his original probation orders.

Reversed and remanded with directions to proceed in harmony with the views herein expressed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proprietors Ins. Co. v. Siegel
410 So. 2d 993 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 So. 2d 993, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foust-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.