Foust v. Hughes

205 S.E.2d 722, 285 N.C. 589, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1022
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 4, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 S.E.2d 722 (Foust v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foust v. Hughes, 205 S.E.2d 722, 285 N.C. 589, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1022 (N.C. 1974).

Opinion

205 S.E.2d 722 (1974)
285 N.C. 589

Dan FOUST and the State of North Carolina on relation of Dan Foust
v.
Michael T. HUGHES et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 4, 1974.

Walter G. Green, for the plaintiffs.

Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., Ann Reed, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant Boswell.

Petition by plaintiffs for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 21 N.C.App. 268, 204 S.2d 230. Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Jacobs v. Sherard
243 S.E.2d 184 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 S.E.2d 722, 285 N.C. 589, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foust-v-hughes-nc-1974.