Foust v. Hughes

205 S.E.2d 722, 285 N.C. 589, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1022
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 4, 1974·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

205 S.E.2d 722 (1974)
285 N.C. 589

Dan FOUST and the State of North Carolina on relation of Dan Foust
v.
Michael T. HUGHES et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 4, 1974.

Walter G. Green, for the plaintiffs.

Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., Ann Reed, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant Boswell.

Petition by plaintiffs for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 21 N.C.App. 268, 204 S.2d 230. Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foust v. Hughes, 205 S.E.2d 722, 285 N.C. 589, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1022 (N.C. 1974).

205 S.E.2d 722 (Foust v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Jacobs v. Sherard
243 S.E.2d 184 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)