Foust v. Bufford
This text of 448 P.2d 645 (Foust v. Bufford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case involves the same undisputed facts which formed the basis of Foust v. Birds Eye Division of General Foods Corp., 91 Idaho 418, 422 P.2d 616 (1967), except that here the Fousts have sued Bufford, Mrs. Foust’s then fellow employee. The decision of the district court below, granting Bufford’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that he was as a matter of law acting in the course of his employment, is affirmed on the authority of the first Foust case, supra, and the numerous authorities cited therein.
Judgment affirmed. Costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 P.2d 645, 92 Idaho 639, 1968 Ida. LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foust-v-bufford-idaho-1968.