Foussard v. Olarte-Foussard

128 A.D.3d 549, 8 N.Y.S.3d 562
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 2015·No. 15173N 100154/10·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered December 13, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgement dismissing the malicious prosecution cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*550 Dismissal of the malicious prosecution claim was warranted where the record, including plaintiffs threatening emails to defendant, demonstrates that the criminal proceeding against him did not lack probable cause (see generally Brown v Sears Roebuck & Co., 297 AD2d 205, 208 [1st Dept 2002]). Furthermore, defendant, a civilian, did not initiate the criminal proceeding, but merely conveyed information to the authorities (see Moorhouse v Standard, N.Y., 124 AD3d 1, 7-8 [1st Dept 2014]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Saxe, ManzanetDaniels and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foussard v. Olarte-Foussard, 128 A.D.3d 549, 8 N.Y.S.3d 562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

128 A.D.3d 549 (Foussard v. Olarte-Foussard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moorhouse v. Standard
124 A.D.3d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)